“The Board considered that the Facebook
site of an advertiser is a marketing communication tool over which the
advertiser has a reasonable degree of control and could be considered to
draw the attention of
a segment of the public to a product in a manner calculated to promote
or oppose directly or indirectly that product. The Board determined that
the provisions of the Code apply to an advertiser’s Facebook page. As a
Facebook page can be used to engage with
customers, the Board further considered that the Code applies to the
content generated by the advertisers as well as material or comments
posted by users or friends.”
See Diageo Australia
Adsense HTML
Who owns the copyright and inventions produced by an AI machine?
These articles are some of the interesting articles dealing with ownership of copyright and patentable inventions produced by an AI machine ...
-
auDA has constituted a policy review panel to review virtually all domain name policies in Australia, as well as to recommend a policy to im...
-
The issue of content regulation in China was mentioned in this blog last year . In the last few weeks, this issue has once again pushed into...
-
At the end of last year, the Federal Court of Australia issued a judgment in against the Redbubble platform, in favour of Pokemon. The jud...
No comments:
Post a Comment