“The Board considered that the Facebook
site of an advertiser is a marketing communication tool over which the
advertiser has a reasonable degree of control and could be considered to
draw the attention of
a segment of the public to a product in a manner calculated to promote
or oppose directly or indirectly that product. The Board determined that
the provisions of the Code apply to an advertiser’s Facebook page. As a
Facebook page can be used to engage with
customers, the Board further considered that the Code applies to the
content generated by the advertisers as well as material or comments
posted by users or friends.”
See Diageo Australia
A blog relating to Internet legal issues by Professor John Swinson, University of Queensland
Adsense HTML
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
How should damages be assessed for privacy and cybersecurity breaches
Listen to this podcast where I discuss how damages should be assessed in privacy and cybersecurity lawsuits. The Lawyers Weekly Show host J...
-
The United Nations intellectual property agency (WIPO) is the latest front in the US-China trade war. http://www.theage.com.au/world/sad-am...
-
The issue of content regulation in China was mentioned in this blog last year . In the last few weeks, this issue has once again pushed into...
-
Finally, what is called direct registration of domain names is coming to Australia. See https://www.auda.org.au/statement/australias-interne...
No comments:
Post a Comment