The South Australian Full Court decided against Google Inc. in the recent case of Google v. Duffy. See http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/sa/SASCFC/2017/130.html
Google's search results included defamatory material. Google was found to be a secondary publisher.
Case note here.
A blog relating to Internet legal issues by Professor John Swinson, University of Queensland
Adsense HTML
AirBNB Hell
An interesting website that points out the risks of using AirBNB for both hosts and guests, www.airbnbhell.com
Digital Watermarks on Printed Documents
"The question is how the government identified her so quickly, and the answer may be that she was inadvertently outed by the Intercept itself. That’s because the website posted an image of the leaked document containing an almost-invisible code applied by the printer that produced the document sent to the Intercept. The digital watermark identified the printer model and serial number, along with the time and date then document was printed out."
See LA Times
See LA Times
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Privacy and Opt-Out
Many people are aware of the use of cookies for tracking purposes. But that is old technology. Many advertisers use more sophisticated tec...
-
The United Nations intellectual property agency (WIPO) is the latest front in the US-China trade war. http://www.theage.com.au/world/sad-am...
-
Carly Long, an expert in domain name litigation, will teach the first half of the class this Tuesday evening. You may wish to have a look a...
-
On U.S. Election Day, 3 November 2020, voters in the State of California overwhelmingly voted in favour of Proposition 24—a ballot measure t...