A blog relating to Internet legal issues by Professor John Swinson, University of Queensland
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
New Californian Privacy Law: CPRA to effectively replace CCPA
On U.S. Election Day, 3 November 2020, voters in the State of California overwhelmingly voted in favour of Proposition 24—a ballot measure t...

-
The United Nations intellectual property agency (WIPO) is the latest front in the US-China trade war. http://www.theage.com.au/world/sad-am...
-
Carly Long, an expert in domain name litigation, will teach the first half of the class this Tuesday evening. You may wish to have a look a...
-
This website has some useful links and references: http://www.epiphanysolutions.co.uk/article-index/rights-and-laws-of-the-internet/

1 comment:
I was looking into the discussion regarding what is considered to be "reasonable steps" - clearly the all three judges accept that sending warnings to users ought to be considered a reasonable step.
But I dont think the it was clear as to wheather the judges were willing to accept that people, when notified of copyright infringement, would do anything about it.
In my opinion, I think people would simply ignore the notice and think that their activities would not be serious or detactable.
Navaneetha Jayachandra
Post a Comment