An interesting recent Federal Circuit Court decision to the
effect that a person’s name at the bottom of an email was a signature -
Austral-Asia Freight Pty Ltd v Turner [2013] FCCA 298
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCCA/2013/298.html
A blog relating to Internet legal issues by Professor John Swinson, University of Queensland
Adsense HTML
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
How should damages be assessed for privacy and cybersecurity breaches
Listen to this podcast where I discuss how damages should be assessed in privacy and cybersecurity lawsuits. The Lawyers Weekly Show host J...
-
The issue of content regulation in China was mentioned in this blog last year . In the last few weeks, this issue has once again pushed into...
-
The United Nations intellectual property agency (WIPO) is the latest front in the US-China trade war. http://www.theage.com.au/world/sad-am...
-
Google LLC v Defteros [2022] HCA 27 , decided 17 August 2022 by High Court of Australia. The High Court decided that for the purposes of ...
1 comment:
9 Signatures
(1) If, under a law of this jurisdiction, the signature of a person is required, that requirement is taken to have been met in relation to an electronic communication if—
(a) a method is used to identify the person and to indicate the person's intention in respect of the information communicated; and
(b) the method used was either—
(i) as reliable as appropriate for the purpose for which the electronic communication was generated or communicated, in the light of all the circumstances, including any relevant agreement; or
Its comforting here that that "any relevant agreement" is mentioned. So in a contract management environment provision relating to claims or excusing causes for instance that require certain conditions precedent and formalities related to writing are saved.
Post a Comment